The Word "Aum" In Hinduism

garry420

Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2019
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
Points
16
The word "AUM" is often translated as simply "God", and, for general purposes, this straightforward translation suffices. However, this is, in fact, an extreme oversimplification of the meaning of "AUM", as becomes clear on closer examination.
The 'Hindu' Dharma (henceforth referred to, for simplicity, as "Hinduism") is full of a huge amount of symbolism, and subtle representation, since it argues that God does not hand out everything on a plate, but some effort must come from our side also. Thus, in a number of cases, when investigating the meaning of a certain principle or concept in Hinduism, it is necessary to look very deeply into them, and try to interpret their message (or rather messages, since in general, one finds in Hinduism that one word or symbol will be a representation of a huge number of different ideas and concepts).

This is true of the word "AUM" (which is the closest transliteration possible in the Roman script). One of the vast number of signs and symbols commonly used in Hinduism, whilst extremely simple in form, it carries a huge amount of importance, and is representative of a number of profound ideas and deep truths.

Actually, it is incorrect to describe AUM as one among many. AUM is the central pillar upon which the rest of Hinduism rests. This is the highest, and the central concept in Hinduism, and thus its interpretation, and the explanation of its significance is extremely complex. One could easily spend an entire lifetime explaining various different facets of the significance and interpretation of AUM, and still not manage to cover it in its entirety. However, there are some major points which can be described.

Firstly, it is important to note that the word AUM consists of three letters, or sounds: "a", known as "akaram"; "u", called "ukaram"; and "m", or "makaram". Each of these carries an individual meaning, and thus it is necessary to use a tripartite model in order to fully comprehend the significance of the word in its entirety. Thus, the simple word AUM carries the key to the entire tripartite theory in Hinduism, i.e. "Traita-vada", the theory propogated by Maharishi Dayanand Saraswati (founder of the Arya Samaj faith). This tripartite theory has great sigificance, and represents a number of ideas.

(1) The first, and most important relevance of this tripartite model is the distinction between the three Gunas". The word "Guna" can be translated as "form", "attribute" or "quality". This idea of three Gunas is explained at great depth by Sri Krishna in the Bhagavad Gita, first being introduced in a broad sense in the 14th Discourse (The Yoga of the Division of the Three Gunas), and then later being discussed again, in the context of the inherent nature of the individual in the 17th Discourse (The Yoga of the Division of the Threefold Faith). He introduces the topic in the 14th Discourse, Verse 4, by saying :-



Sattwam rajastama iti gunaah prakritisambhavaah
Nibadhnanti mahaabaaho dehe dehinamavyayam

These qualities - Sattvik, Rajasik and Tamasik - inexorably bind together the body (i.e. the material world), the embodied (i.e. the soul or spirit) and the indestructible (i.e. God).

Sattwam = Sattva; Rajas = Rajas; Tama = Tamas; Iti = These; Gunaah = Gunas; Prakriti = Nature; Sambhavaah = Born of (Possible due to/because of)
Nibadhnanti = They bind; Mahaabaaho = Inexorably (With great strength); Dehe = Body; Dehinam = Embodied; Avyayam = Indestructible



[N.B. Of course, the soul is also indestructible, but gripped by Maya, it fails to realise its own divinity.]
The Sattva Guna is held to be that which is representative of all that which is pure and uplifting. Rajasik represents the inertial qualities. The Tamasik Guna encompassess al that is lowering and impure.

(2) Following on from this idea of the three Gunas is the idea which is most commonly spoken about when discussing the meaning of AUM. This is the Hindu view of the cycle of creation, sustenance and destruction.

The sound "a" represents Creation, which is known as "Sristi". The "u" is representative of Sustenance, which is called "Stiti". The "m" symbolises Destruction, or "Laya". These three together make up one cycle of the Universe, which is called "Kalpa".

Creation is equatable to the Sattvik Guna, it being an uplifting phenomenon. Sustenance, or maintenance of a status quo, is comparable to the Rajasik Guna, which represents inertia. Destruction can be compared with the Tamasik Guna, in following with its lowering nature.

It is worth noting a comparison that is often drawn here between the Hindu concept of this divine trinity of Sristi, Stiti and Laya, and the English word "GOD". The three letters of this word can also be taken to represent this same trinity - "G" for "Generation"; "O" for "Overseeing"; and "D" for "Destruction".

(3) In Hindu mythology, these three functions of God - i.e. Creation, Sustenance and Destruction - are represented by three gods, the divine trinity, or "Trimurti", namely, Brahma the Creator, Vishnu the Sustainer and Shiva the Destroyer.

It must be asked at this point how it can be possible that Lord Shiva can possibly be described by an impure, lowering quality. The reason for this apparent anomaly is that the translation of Tamasik cannot be taken as being entirely accurate. The impure nature implied by Tamasik is related to the intrinsic nature of the function - i.e. that of Destruction.

Since Destruction in itself is a lowering and impure act, it is related to Tamas. However, further interpolation of this intrinsically Tamasik nature is not possible. Whilst intrinsically Tamasik, the Destruction carried out by Lord Shiva can actually be thought of as a kind of constructive destruction. Before anything can be created, it is necessary to ensure that the environment in which the creation is to take place is pure, since any impurities present at the creation of a thing will, of course, manifest themselves in its operation. Hence, it is necessary to get rid of any impurities and unwanted elements. This is the process generally referred to as "sterilisation". Whilst the process of sterilisation requires that all unwanted elemets are destroyed, thus making this a destructive process, it is a necessary step in the creation of a new thing, and is thus part of the constructive process. Hence, whilst the Destructive function of Shiva is intrinsically impure and lowering, it has an instrumentally pure and uplifting nature. Thus, this Tamasik nature of Shiva can be thought of as a purifying impurity. For this reason, Shiva is often thought of as having somewhat a Creative function, rather than a purely Destructive one.

(4) Again referring to Hindu mythology, each of these three gods is said to have a consort, who remains by his side, and is referred to as his "shakti", or strength. Hinduism believes that whatever a male is able to accomplish, it is due to the strength of the relevant female, be that his mother or his wife. Thus, rather than a man without a woman being incomplete, Hinduism would argue that a man without a woman is nothing. The three consorts of the Trimurti then are Saraswati Devi the consort of Lord Brahma, Lakshmi Devi the consort of Lord Vishnu, and Parvati Devi the consort of Lord Shiva. These three Devis represent the special "shaktis" that each of the gods require in order to carry out their respective functions...

Saraswati Devi, Goddess of Truth, Justice, Knowledge and Virtue, embodies all those aspects which are needed in order to carry out Creation. Without these qualities, Creation would not be possible.

Lakshmi Devi, Goddess of Wealth, Prosperity, Fertility and Love, represents all those attributes which are required to carry out the function of Sustenance.

Parvati Devi, Goddess of Power, Courage, Sacrifice and Strength, is the personification of all those attributes needed to carry out Destruction. It would be impossible to carry out this role without these qualities.

(5) The next aspect to examine is the concept of Traita-vada in its strictest sense, as propogated by Maharishi Dayananda - i.e. as a school of philosophy attempting to explain the true nature of Reality. As opposed to Advaita and Dvaita, the Traita theory argues that this Reality exists in three forms - God, soul and matter.
 

garry420

Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2019
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
Points
16
God, the ultimately Sattvik entity, is invisible and formless. However, whilst God Himself does not have any form (please refer to my earlier article on the nature of God), He is able to manifest Himself through the medium of the physical Universe. Hence it is that God is manifest in each and every particle of the physical Universe, whilst still being able to remain completely detached from it all. This formless nature of God is exemplified in a quote from Shvetaashvetar Upanishad (taken from verses 6.8, 6.11 and 6.12):-


To create the Universe is the natural function of God. He does not require a body or sensory organs for this. There is none equal to God, so how can there be a being superior to Him. His power is great and incomparable. In Him, the natural qualities of knowledge, power and creativity exist.

The soul is a Rajasik entity, which, divine in nature, fails to realise this divinity due to the power of Maya. Known as the "Jeevaatmaa", the individual soul is unseen. It is formless and subtle, but is able, however, to manifest itself through some form of body. Despite its divinity, the soul is, due to the effect of Maya, limited and imperfect. The soul possesses consciousness, and is thus differentiable from matter on the basis of its consciousness-derived attributes, namely creation, enjoyment and knowledge. The Darshan Shastras explain the attributes of the soul in more detail. In Nyaaya Darshan (1.1.10), the soul is described as possessing the attributes of desire, envy, diligence, pleasure, pain and knowledge. Vaisheshika Darshan (3.2.4) describes the soul has having the qualities of inhalation and exhalation of air, closing and opening of the eyes, thinking, walking, hunger, thirst, happiness and suffering, desire, industry and gaining experience.
Matter is the quintessential Tamasik entity. Known as "Prakriti", or "Nature", it is made up of five parts, which are called the "Paanch Mahaabhu", or "Paanch Tattva", the five basic elements, these being Earth, Water, Fire, Air and Ether/Space. These five tattva correspond to the five qualities of Smell, Taste, Touch, Sound and Light respectively, which in turn can be related to the five senses. Being made up of these five basic elements, the physical body is known as "Shautik", or "Material".

The relationship between these three entities is demonstrated by two verses from the Vedas. The first is taken from Atharva Veda (10.8.25):-

Baalaad ekam aneeyaskam uta-ekam naiva drshyate
Tatah parishvajeeyasee devataa saa mama priyaa

The one (i.e. Prakriti) is even subtler than hair and the other (i.e. Jeevaatmaa) is invisible. But the subtlest and all-pervading deity (i.e. Ishvar, or God) is the only object of my love.

The second verse is taken from Rig Veda (1.164.20):-


Dvaa suparnaa sayujaa sakhaayaa samaanam vrksham pari sashvajaate
Tayor anyah pippalam svaadu-atti-anashnan anyo abhi chaakasheeti

There are two birds (i.e. Jeevaatmaa and Ishvar), united with the bond of friendship, which reside on the same tree (i.e. Prakriti). One of them (i.e. Jeevaatmaa) enjoyes the sweet ripe fruit (i.e. Maya), whereas the other (i.e. Ishvar) witnesses everything without enjoying its fruits (God sees Maya, but is unaffected by it).

The three entities can also be related to one another by another word, also, like AUM, often translated simply as "God". The word "Satchidananda" is made up of three parts, namely: "Sat", implying existence; "Chit", representing consciousness; and "Ananda", symbolising bliss.
Matter possesses the quality of Sat, but is devoid of either Chit or Ananda. The soul, being itself 'alive' has the qualities of both Sat and Chit, but, due to its ignorance of its own true nature, and thus the nature of the Supreme Reality, it is devoid of Ananda. God alone possesses all three attributes of Sat, Chit and Ananda, and it is for this reason that God is known as Satchidananda.

(6) The Sattva-Rajas-Tamas divide has also been compared with the Varna Vyavasthaa, the original and uncorrupted predecessor of the modern-day caste system. According to this vyavasthaa (i.e. "system"), each individual was to choose their own varna (literally meaning "to choose") according to their own particular skills and talents. Hence, there was a fourfold division of society into Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas and Shudras (untouchables did not exist in this system).

The people within each of these varnas (which acted as a kind of Trade Union type system) had a specific inbuilt make-up as regards the three Gunas. Thus, Brahmins were those possessing the Sattvik Guna; Kshatriyas were those who had both the Sattvik and Rajasik Gunas; Vaishyas possessed the Rajasik and Tamasik Gunas; and Shudras were those having the Tamasik Guna.

This structure has been related to Plato's tripartite structure of the soul and its relation to his idea of the ideal society, as described in his famous work, "The Republic". The three Gunas can be related to his tripartite theory of the soul, in which he describes three aspects of the soul, namely: "Reason", which can be related to "Sattva"; "Passion", which can be compared with "Rajas"; and "Appetite", which is identifiable with "Tamas".

Plato then goes on to use a similar tripartite structure in his build-up of society: those with the quality of "Reason" being known as the "Guardians", who were to be philosophers and rulers; those having the attribute of "Passion" were to be the "Auxiliaries", who would form the military and law-enforcement agencies; and those possessing the aspect of "Appetite" would form the "Traders", who would make up the commercial community.

There are a few major differences between this and the Hindu model. Firstly, since the civilisation in which Plato lived considered slaves to be possessions rather than people, they did not feature in Plato's system. The slaves in those times made up the manual labourers, etc., and so they, by the Hindu model, would be the Shudras (note, in the Hindu civilisation, these people would not be slaves, since the concept of slavery is not present in Hinduism). Also, Hindu philosophy would argue that those involved in philosophy would generally have neither the time nor the will to handle the looking after of the State, and so the intellectuals would be separate from the rulers, thus making up a separate class of their own, which can be related to the Brahmins. Finally, since the qualities of a ruler are judged in Hinduism to be simply well-refined versions of those required of Plato's "Auxiliaries", these two are grouped together as Kshatriyas. Plato's "Traders" can be directly compared to the Vaishyas in the Hindu model.

(7) There are a number of other possible interpretations of this tripartite model, which all follow in this same kind of pattern:-
  • Three debts (to parents, Guru and God)

  • Three paths (of Knowledge, Duty and Devotion)

  • Three aspects of the individual (physical, mental and spiritual - note the relationship to the division between Prakriti, Jeevaatmaa and Ishvar)

  • Three forms of Truth (in thought, word and deed)

  • Three worlds (earth, sky and space - alternatively, some would argue that the distinction here is between hell, earth and heaven. However, many Hindus do not believe in the concept of 'hell', since they would argue that, in the context of punarjanma, hell has no meaning or relevance)

  • Three types of suffering (physical ailments, natural calamities and mental afflictions)

  • Three states of consciousness (waking, "paradoxical" sleep - i.e. dreaming - and "deep" sleep)

  • Three qualities of God (omniscience, omnipotence and omnipresence)

  • Three time periods (past, present and future)
Thus far, the interpretation of the word AUM has focussed on the tripartite structure symbolised by its three letters. However, there is a fourth syllable in the word AUM also, which is known as "Anuswara", the silent pause between successive chants of AUM (comparable to the period between the Destruction of one World, and the subsequent Creation of the next). The relevance of this final syllable can, perhaps, be best explained by reference to a quote from the Mandukya Upanishad:-
 

garry420

Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2019
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Aum is the Aksara, or imperishable syllable.
Aum is the Universe, and this is the exposition of Aum.
The past, the present and the future, all that was, all that is, all that will be, is Aum.
Likewise, all else that may exist beyond the bounds of time, that too is Aum.



It is this final sentence that describes the relevance of Anuswara. Beyond the bounds of sound, by which the other three syllables are limited, Anuswara represents that which exists above and beyond that which can be described by these three syllables. If God, Soul and Matter are represented by Akaram, Ukaram and Makaram, that single, unifying, ultimate Supreme Reality which binds all these three together is represented by the Anuswara. Whilst these three vocal sounds represent the Sattvik, Rajasik and Tamasik natures, the Anuswara is symbolic of that which cannot be described in such crude terms. Free from the bounds of imperfect human pronunciation, likewise is the symbolism of Anuswara free from the bounds of the limited human intellect. Anuswara represents the Supreme Truth, the Highest Reality.
AUM is also believed by many Hindus to be the sound made at the time of the Big Bang, when the Universe was Created (the idea of the "singularity" can be found in Hindu scriptures, where it is known as "Hiranya Garbha", or a point source of energy). Since everything emanates from this Big Bang, AUM is considered as the eternal energy.

The reciting or chanting of AUM with emphasis on its correct pronunciation is believed to create within the body certain vibrations which lead to the awakening of various dormant centers within the body in general, and the brain in particular, which lead to the feeling of harmony, peace and bliss.

AUM is also known as "Pranava". Since it is a sound, it requires air for its expression. As it runs through air or "prana" (literally "breath"), AUM is held to be that which pervades all life.

Hinduism is famous for its so-called idol-"worship" (it is important to note that this is a misappelation, since it is not, in fact, the idol that Hindus worship, but the concepts and values which the individual is reminded of by that idol). Idols can be either solid (for example a statue) or subtle (for example the fire in a havan kund). Sound also can be formed into an idol of extremely subtle nature. This then is the representation of AUM. AUM is an idol which reminds the individual of certain concepts and ideas. All in all, AUM is the very essence of Hinduism, and encompasses in one simple word the whole of Hindu thought and philosophy.

Via: Nation of Hindutva.
 
Top